top of page

Does blood type determine our personality?

There has long been a notion that blood types can determine an individual's personality traits in popular culture and certain belief systems. From job interviews to relationship compatibility assessments, some people believe that blood types hold the key to understanding human behavior. However, it is essential to approach such claims with skepticism and examine them critically. This article delves into blood types and personality, explores the origins of this belief, and presents scientific evidence that debunks the myth.



Origins of the Blood Type Personality Theory:

The concept of associating blood types with personality traits originated in Japan in the early 20th century. In 1927, Japanese professor Takeji Furukawa published a book titled "The Study of Temperament Through Blood Type" which laid the foundation for the blood type personality theory. Furukawa proposed that each blood type — namely A, B, AB, and O — corresponded to specific personality characteristics. This idea gained traction in Japan and eventually spread to other countries, particularly in East Asia.

The Theory and Personality Traits:

According to the blood type personality theory, individuals with different blood types possess distinct traits. Here is a summary of the commonly associated characteristics:



  1. Type A: People with blood type A are often believed to be calm, responsible, and detail-oriented. They are perceived as perfectionists, sensitive, and cooperative.

  2. Type B: Individuals with blood type B are thought to be outgoing, creative, and passionate. They are considered as enthusiastic, independent, and strong-willed.

  3. Type AB: Those with blood type AB are often described as rational, adaptable, and empathetic. They are believed to possess both A and B type traits, exhibiting a blend of characteristics.

  4. Type O: People with blood type O are typically regarded as confident, sociable, and expressive. They are perceived as practical, adventurous, and goal-oriented.



Scientific Evidence and Debunking the Myth:

Despite the widespread belief in blood type personality traits, scientific research has failed to provide any substantial evidence supporting this theory. Numerous studies conducted over the years have aimed to examine the correlation between blood types and personality but the results have consistently yielded inconclusive or contradictory findings.



One notable study published in the journal "Personality and Individual Differences" in 2015 analyzed data from over 10,000 participants. The researchers found no significant association between blood types and personality traits. Another study published in the "Asian Journal of Social Psychology" in 2018 explored the relationship between blood types and personality in a sample of over 1,000 Japanese participants. The study concluded that blood types were not reliable predictors of personality.



Furthermore, from a biological perspective, blood types are determined by specific antigens present on the surface of red blood cells. These antigens have no known influence on an individual's psychological or behavioral traits. Personality, on the other hand, is a complex construct shaped by a myriad of genetic, environmental, and social factors. It cannot be simplified or reduced to a single physiological characteristic like blood type.

Cultural Factors and Confirmation Bias:

The continuance of the blood type personality theory can be attributed to cultural factors and confirmation bias. In East Asian countries, particularly Japan and South Korea, blood type personality traits have become deeply ingrained in popular culture. People often identify with their blood type personalities and use them as a means of self-expression and social interaction.

Moreover, confirmation bias plays a significant role in perpetuating this belief. When individuals encounter situations that seem to align with their perceived blood type traits, they attribute those instances to the accuracy of the theory. At the same time, they may ignore or dismiss contradictory evidence, reinforcing their preconceived notions.

bottom of page